• The claim is too vague to verify: it does not specify a country, time period, specific minority group, or crime type. Without these parameters, no specific statistic can be evaluated.
• Criminologists universally acknowledge a “dark figure of crime” that applies to all demographic groups—actual crime always exceeds reported crime because many offenses go unreported or undetected¹².
• Evidence on whether minorities are uniquely undercounted is mixed and crime-specific. For some serious violent crimes (e.g., homicide), victimization surveys confirm higher offending rates among minorities that correspond to higher arrest rates³⁴. For other offenses (e.g., drug crimes), self-report studies show similar usage rates across races but higher arrest rates for minorities, suggesting official statistics may over-represent rather than under-represent minority offending⁵⁴.
• Some studies find Black respondents underreport their own offenses in self-report surveys compared with official records, which complicates the assumption that official statistics systematically undercount minority crime⁶.
• Because the claim lacks necessary specificity and the available research does not support a blanket conclusion that the actual number is higher for minorities across the board, verification is not possible.

Overall validity: Unknown

1. 2.1. Dark or Hidden Figure of Crime – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System
2. Dark figure of crime | Law | Research Starters | EBSCO Research
3. One in Five: Disparities in Crime and Policing
4. Race and crime in the United States
5. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Crime and Criminal Justice in ...
6. Assessing the Race–Crime and Ethnicity–Crime Relationship ...