The Kennedy Center has fully removed President Donald Trump's name from its building, following a court's orders to reverse the center's name change before an extended deadline, Executive Director Matt Floca told a judge in court documents Saturday. A judge had granted the Kennedy Center's request for additional time to fully remove Trump's name from the building, giving the arts center until noon Saturday after the organization missed an 11:59 p.m. Friday deadline. The 12-hour extension came after Justice Department attorneys representing the center said late Friday that while work was ongoing, thunderstorms in the Washington area caused delays. Tap the link in our bio to read more. 📸: Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg/Getty Images
The CNN post is largely accurate in its central claims but contains a partially disputed detail. The post correctly reports that the Kennedy Center fully removed President Donald Trump’s name from its buildingCLAIM 3, and that Executive Director Matt Floca told a judge in court documents Saturday that the removal was completeCLAIM 2. It also accurately states that a judge granted the center additional time until noon Saturday after it missed the initial 11:59 p.m. Friday deadlineCLAIM 1CLAIM 4.
However, the post’s claim that Justice Department attorneys specifically said thunderstorms caused delays is the subject of conflicting attribution. While the DOJ was representing the Kennedy Center in related litigation, some reports attribute the thunderstorm delay justification to the center’s executive director Matt Floca rather than DOJ attorneys, creating uncertainty about who exactly filed the request for the extension citing weatherCLAIM 5. Because this detail is secondary to the main news and the conflicting evidence leaves the claim partially unverified, it slightly lowers the overall reliability of the post.
Overall validity: 90%
Overall validity: 95%
Analysis of the claim:
Caveat:
Overall validity: 95%
Overall validity: 95%
Fact-Check: Kennedy Center Name Removal Deadline Extension
Overall validity: 95%
Here is my fact-check of this claim:
Analysis:
Overall validity: 70%