The point is to push Putin into a place where he cannot ignore this.
Overall validity: 15%
Reasoning:
Overall validity: 90%
The claim that oil refineries in Russia were blown up is well supported by multiple independent sources.
Overall validity: 95%
Overall validity: 85%
The claim bundles three real attacks and then attributes them to the US/NATO — an attribution that is not supported by the evidence.
What actually happened in the cited events:
Why the "US/NATO are behind it" framing fails:
Kernel of truth (why not 0%): Western support is real and substantial — weapons, funding, training, and in at least some cases US intelligence sharing that enabled specific strikes inside Russia (e.g., the Toropets depot attack)14. So the US/NATO do enable some attacks, which is likely the seed the narrative grows from. But "enabling/supporting" is not the same as being "behind" (i.e., orchestrating or directing) attacks on Russian territory, and the claim's specific attribution of the beach, refinery and school incidents to US/NATO direction is unsupported.
Overall validity: 10%