--- title: "Milan Mazurek tells the truth about EU! @Milan Mazurek #eu #climate #climatechan…" source: "https://tiktok.com/@finpatriot/video/7578197685870628118" platform: "TikTok" factual_accuracy: 12 overall_accuracy: 10 tags: ["eu politics", "european union", "europe", "environmental sustainability", "carbon emissions", "climate change", "greenwashing"] --- # Source fact-check: Milan Mazurek tells the truth about EU! @Milan Mazurek #eu #climate #climatechan… Original post: https://tiktok.com/@finpatriot/video/7578197685870628118 Factual accuracy: 12% · Overall accuracy: 10% ## Source post **Target post by @finpatriot** > Milan Mazurek tells the truth about EU! @Milan Mazurek #eu #climate #climatechange > [attached video 0](https://v16m.tiktokcdn-us.com/2714f058ba96ffc7e3e04da3f456b83a/6a555377/video/tos/useast2a/tos-useast2a-ve-68c810-euttp/oIEIUy0AZ572HzSrBCIR8liULFQApwf2iKCZBs/?a=1233&bti=OTg7QGo5QHM6OjZALTAzYCMvcCMxNDNg&&bt=618&ft=gKfIn8QLodzR12NvqEWZzIxR6PQ.xq_45SY&mime_type=video_mp4&rc=aWQ7ZjY0OmU6ODU6Mzc5M0BpM3Y4M3A5cnNsNzMzbzczNUBjL2NjMjRiXzExYGM1Ni5gYSM2MGFvMmRzaGlhLS1kMTFzcw%3D%3D&vvpl=1&l=2026071315055144B104BEEF3C920A5140&btag=e00090000) > > Video transcript: Stop with your green scam. You are lying to the people. Nobody is saving the planet here. While you are banning normal cars with combustion engines for ordinary citizens of the European Union and making their lives more expensive with new taxes and emission permits, even for the households, some overpopulated countries somewhere in Asia, like India or Malaysia, are filling the oceans with endless amounts of plastic waste every day. The only things you care about is how to gain more control over the people's lives, is how to gain more power, and of course, how to make more money. You are enriching yourselves at the expense of taxpayers' hard work and selling them fake ideas about saving the planet. But the majority of people in the European Union, they do not want to get rid of the fossil fuels. They do not want to pay for your social and ideological experiments. And that's why the only real conclusion of any climate conference should be that there will be no climate conferences in the future until the EU officials will not come to the common sense again. ## Post analysis Verdict: 10% · Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 The post presents Milan Mazurek’s remarks as the truth about the EU, yet the verifiable statements in the video are largely false or misleading. Mazurek claims the EU is banning normal combustion-engine cars for ordinary citizens, but no EU-wide ban on existing private vehicles is in effect or confirmed, and the proposed 2035 target for new sales has actually been weakened rather than strengthened[^1]. He also asserts that the EU is imposing emission permits on households, but the second Emissions Trading System legally obliges fuel suppliers—not households—to monitor, report, and surrender allowances[^2]. While Mazurek claims the EU is making life more expensive with new taxes on households, the Union does not have direct taxation powers over citizens; the only recent EU-level charge affecting households is a €3 customs duty on low-value e-commerce imports, making the broad claim highly misleading[^3]. Regarding plastic pollution, Mazurek states that India and Malaysia are filling the oceans with endless plastic waste daily. Both countries are significant sources of marine plastic, but the quantities are finite and measurable, and India ranks second globally behind the Philippines, not first[^4][^5]. Moreover, Mazurek claims that a majority of EU citizens do not want to get rid of fossil fuels, yet survey data consistently show large majorities support reducing fossil-fuel dependence and back the clean-energy transition[^6]. The accusations that EU officials are enriching themselves at taxpayers’ expense and that citizens oppose paying for vague “social and ideological experiments” lack sufficient specificity to be fact-checked against available evidence[^7][^8]. Because the post frames these false and exaggerated assertions as telling the truth, it is highly misleading. **Overall validity**: 10% [^1]: [The European Union is banning internal combustion engine cars for private citizens.](#XoMA3pbHyLqUYK18vKfI) [^2]: [The European Union is imposing emission permits on households.](#tkuwV4dQ2ChvUvvkRyHl) [^3]: [The European Union is imposing new taxes on households.](#KTJHlUD9WGRLdgjlWVu2) [^4]: [Malaysia is filling the oceans with endless amounts of plastic waste every day.](#oTKfe0iNC3zEqhE2KVFx) [^5]: [India is filling the oceans with endless amounts of plastic waste every day.](#4PZNJdQ8olCcMqPrr3CS) [^6]: [The majority of people in the European Union do not want to get rid of fossil fuels.](#ftNDIh2qmLbjOadqlaFX) [^7]: [A majority of people in the European Union do not want to pay for social and ideological experiments.](#MOFz3kAEOOuJvLR37jGT) [^8]: [European Union officials are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers' hard work.](#XyjF5hi77EhTdROHTJry) ## Claims found (8) ### 1. The European Union is banning internal combustion engine cars for private citizens. — 0% Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/XoMA3pbHyLqUYK18vKfI - The EU did adopt a 2022 regulation that would have required a 100% CO2 reduction for new cars and vans by 2035, effectively banning new internal combustion engine (ICE) registrations from that date, but this measure applied only to new sales and never to existing vehicles owned by private citizens[^1][^2]. - In December 2025, the European Commission proposed abandoning that 2035 ban, replacing the 100% target with a 90% CO2 reduction target and allowing continued sales of combustion-engine vehicles, including plug-in hybrids and cars running on e-fuels or biofuels[^3][^4]. - Senior EU lawmakers have since confirmed that the “technology ban on combustion engines is off the table,” meaning the bloc is moving away from an outright phase-out rather than imposing one[^5]. - As of mid-2026, no EU-wide ban on ICE cars for private citizens is in effect or confirmed; the relevant legislation is being weakened, not strengthened. **Overall validity**: 0% [^1]: [Mostly False: “A ban on new internal combustion engine cars achieves nothing for the climate” – eufactcheck.eu](https://eufactcheck.eu/factcheck/mostly-false-a-ban-on-new-internal-combustion-engine-cars-achieves-nothing-for-the-climate) [^2]: [FAQs on the phase-out of combustion engines in 2035 and ...](https://www.oeko.de/fileadmin/oekodoc/FAQ_phase-out-combustion-engines-electro-mobility.pdf) [^3]: [EU drops 2035 combustion engine ban as global EV shift faces reset](https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/eu-relent-combustion-engines-ban-after-auto-industry-pressure-2025-12-16) [^4]: [EU plans to water down ban on new petrol and diesel cars](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/dec/16/eu-water-down-landmark-ban-new-petrol-diesel-cars) [^5]: [EU ban on combustion engine cars off table, EPP's Weber says](https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/plans-combustion-engine-car-ban-eu-off-table-bild-reports-2025-12-11) ### 2. The European Union is imposing new taxes on households. — 10% Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/KTJHlUD9WGRLdgjlWVu2 - The EU Treaties do not give the Union direct taxation powers over households; direct taxes such as income, property, or social-security contributions remain a member-state competence[^1][^2]. - The EU has recently introduced one new EU-level charge that affects households: a flat €3 customs duty on low-value e-commerce imports (under €150) that took effect on 1 July 2026, raising costs for consumers who buy from non-EU online platforms[^3][^4]. - The EU Emissions Trading System for buildings and road transport (ETS2) was postponed to 2028 and does not impose emission permits or taxes on households directly; the legal obligation falls on upstream fuel suppliers[^5][^6][^7]. - Broader EU tax proposals in 2026 (the Tax Simplification Package, DAC recast, etc.) are aimed at businesses and cross-border compliance, not at levying new taxes on households[^8][^9]. - Because the claim is phrased broadly and implies direct EU taxation of households, it is highly misleading, but not entirely baseless: the new customs duty on small imports is a genuine EU-imposed charge that household consumers now pay. **Overall validity**: 10% [^1]: [Harmful tax practices within the EU: definition, identification and ...](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662905/IPOL_STU\(2021\)662905_EN.pdf) [^2]: [Direct taxation: Personal and company taxation | Fact Sheets on the European Union | European Parliament](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/80/direct-taxation-personal-and-company-taxation) [^3]: [Cooperating with fact-checkers, civil society, media and ...](https://commission.europa.eu/topics/countering-information-manipulation/cooperating-fact-checkers-civil-society-media-and-academia_en) [^4]: [EU ends tax loophole exploited by SHEIN, Temu, and Aliexpress | Euronews](https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/06/30/eu-ends-tax-loophole-exploited-by-shein-temu-and-aliexpress) [^5]: [EU Emissions Trading System for buildings and road transport ("EU ETS 2") | International Carbon Action Partnership](https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets/eu-emissions-trading-system-buildings-and-road-transport-eu-ets-2) [^6]: [The European Union is imposing emission permits on households.](#tkuwV4dQ2ChvUvvkRyHl) [^7]: [ETS2: buildings, road transport and additional sectors](https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/carbon-markets/ets2-buildings-road-transport-and-additional-sectors_en) [^8]: [European Commission proposes landmark tax simplification package to streamline compliance and boost competitiveness - Taxation and Customs Union](https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/news/european-commission-proposes-landmark-tax-simplification-package-streamline-compliance-and-boost-2026-06-24_en) [^9]: [EU Tax Simplification Package 2026: How the new Tax Omnibus Directive cuts cross-border red tape](https://scc-ca.com/news/eu-tax-simplification-package-2026) ### 3. The European Union is imposing emission permits on households. — 0% Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/tkuwV4dQ2ChvUvvkRyHl - The EU is introducing a second Emissions Trading System (ETS2) covering fuel use in buildings, road transport, and additional sectors, but it does **not** impose emission permits on households directly. - According to the European Commission’s official climate action portal, the ETS2 will regulate emissions **upstream**: “It will be fuel suppliers, rather than end consumers such as households or car users, that will be required to monitor and report their emissions” and surrender allowances.[^1] - The Centre for European Reform confirms that the regulated entities are intermediaries such as companies selling fuel for cars and heating, “as opposed to final consumers such as households and businesses.”[^2] - Clean Energy Wire likewise notes the new system “will apply to distributors that supply fuels (not households or drivers).”[^3] - While higher fuel prices may pass some costs through to consumers, the legal obligation to hold and surrender emission permits rests with fuel distributors and suppliers, not with households.[^4] **Overall validity**: 0% [^1]: [ETS2: buildings, road transport and additional sectors - Climate Action](https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/carbon-markets/ets2-buildings-road-transport-and-additional-sectors_en) [^2]: [How to make the new emissions trading system work for consumers | Centre for European Reform](https://www.cer.eu/insights/how-make-new-ets-work-consumers) [^3]: [Understanding the European Union's Emissions Trading ...](https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/understanding-european-unions-emissions-trading-system) [^4]: [EU Emission Trading System (EU ETS)  - Florence School of Regulation](https://fsr.eui.eu/eu-emission-trading-system-eu-ets) ### 4. India is filling the oceans with endless amounts of plastic waste every day. — 25% Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/4PZNJdQ8olCcMqPrr3CS - India is a significant contributor to ocean plastic, but it is not the top source. Data shows India ranks 2nd globally, emitting roughly **126,500 metric tons of plastic into the ocean per year** (about 12.9% of global input), while the Philippines is 1st with about **356,400 metric tons** (over 35%)[^1][^2]. - The amount is finite and measurable, not “endless.” Dividing India’s annual ocean plastic by 365 gives an approximate daily rate of **\~350 metric tons**—a large but clearly bounded figure[^1]. - India generates a comparatively small amount of plastic waste per person (around **0.01 kg per day**), but its massive population means total mismanaged waste is high; however, the probability of that waste reaching the ocean is relatively low (**0.5%**) compared with countries like the Philippines (**7%**)[^3]. - The underlying issue is real: India does leak mismanaged plastic into waterways daily and is a major overall plastic polluter. But the claim that India is “filling the oceans” with “endless” waste overstates its share relative to other nations and mischaracterizes the quantity as infinite. **Overall validity**: 25% [^1]: [Visualized: Ocean Plastic Waste Pollution By Country](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/visualized-ocean-plastic-waste-pollution-by-country) [^2]: [Plastic Pollution in The Ocean - 2026 Facts and Statistics](https://www.rts.com/blog/plastic-pollution-in-the-ocean-facts-and-statistics) [^3]: [Where does the plastic in our oceans come from? | Our World in Data](https://ourworldindata.org/ocean-plastics) ### 5. Malaysia is filling the oceans with endless amounts of plastic waste every day. — 30% Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/oTKfe0iNC3zEqhE2KVFx - Malaysia is a significant global source of ocean plastic pollution: a 2015 study by Jambeck et al. ranked it 8th among the top ten countries for mismanaged plastic waste, and both the UN ESCAP and the Malaysian government cite this study[^1][^2]. - The same study estimates Malaysia generated about 0.94 million tonnes of mismanaged plastic waste annually, with roughly 0.14–0.37 million tonnes (about 384–1,014 tonnes per day) potentially leaking into the marine environment[^2][^1]. - More recent reports still place Malaysia among the top three ocean plastic polluters, estimating around 73,000 metric tonnes per year (about 200 tonnes per day) entering the ocean[^3][^4]. - However, the amount is finite and measurable, not “endless,” and the phrase “filling the oceans” is a gross exaggeration of Malaysia’s actual share relative to global ocean volume and total marine plastic inputs. - The claim captures a real, serious problem but is heavily hyperbolic in its description of the scale. **Overall validity**: 30% [^1]: [malaysia's roadmap towards zero - single-use plastics](https://www.pmo.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Malaysia-Roadmap-Towards-Zero-Single-Use-Plastics-2018-2030-m-min.pdf) [^2]: [on plastic pollution in kuala lumpur, malaysia](https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/event-documents/KL%20Baseline%20Report-English.pdf) [^3]: [100+ Plastic in the Ocean Statistics & Facts 2025](https://www.condorferries.co.uk/plastic-in-the-ocean-statistics) [^4]: [Ocean Pollution: Key Facts and Trends 2026 Update](https://www.greenmatch.co.uk/ocean-pollution-facts) ### 6. European Union officials are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers' hard work. — Unknown Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/XyjF5hi77EhTdROHTJry - The claim is a broad, subjective generalisation that does not specify which officials, what time period, or what evidence of illicit enrichment it refers to. - No verified fact-check in the claims database directly matches this sweeping accusation[^1][^2][^3]. - Evidence on EU remuneration shows officials are paid competitive salaries funded by the EU budget, comparable to other international organisations and senior civil servants, but this does not demonstrate systemic self-enrichment at taxpayers’ expense[^4][^5][^6]. - Anti-fraud investigations indicate that misuse of EU funds is taken seriously and appears limited to a small minority rather than a widespread pattern among officials[^7]. - Because the claim is too vague and value-laden to be measured against specific facts, it cannot be assigned a precise validity percentage. **Overall validity**: Unknown [^1]: [EU sanctions are a narrative orchestrated by a few bureaucrats in Brussels](/claim/3WWGXxknNDGxU1b5uMHt) [^2]: [The bureaucrats in Brussels are not directly elected by the general population](/claim/7AWM0BHsnY0WPblONb54) [^3]: [40 million Muslims in Europe receive welfare or other social benefits](/claim/NrMXOFG41RrQJOIJPeuE) [^4]: [Salaries for staff, Parliament members and Commissioners - EUabc](http://en.euabc.com/word/814) [^5]: [Do EU Officials Pay Tax? Salary & Benefits Explained](https://eutraining.eu/content/do-eu-officials-pay-tax-salaries-benefits-and-eu-career-advantages-explained) [^6]: [Reality Check: Who works for the EU and what do they get paid? - BBC News](https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36325311) [^7]: [Protecting EU institutions: OLAF investigations into EU funds misuse in Parliament feed into Paris verdict - European Anti-Fraud Office](https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/protecting-eu-institutions-olaf-investigations-eu-funds-misuse-parliament-feed-paris-verdict-2025-04-02_en) ### 7. A majority of people in the European Union do not want to pay for social and ideological experiments. — Unknown Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/MOFz3kAEOOuJvLR37jGT - The claim uses the undefined phrase “social and ideological experiments,” which does not correspond to any standard category in EU public‑opinion surveys, budget classifications, or statistical datasets. - No verified claim, existing analysis, or poll was found that asks EU citizens whether they are willing to “pay for social and ideological experiments.” - Available Eurobarometer data point to mixed but generally positive attitudes toward social spending in specific areas (e.g., 55 % of Europeans favour more government spending on family policies[^1]) and broad support for EU action on security and social fairness[^2][^3], yet these do not map onto the broad, loaded wording of the claim. - Because the claim lacks a clear, measurable definition and no direct evidence exists to support it, it cannot be assigned a defensible validity percentage. **Overall validity**: Unknown [^1]: [Eurobarometer survey shows 55% of Europeans think their governments should spend more on family policies  | COFACE Families Europe](https://coface-eu.org/eurobarometer-survey-shows-55-of-europeans-think-their-governments-should-spend-more-on-family-policies) [^2]: [Europe appears to be the solution, not the problem](https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/789-europe-appears-to-be-the-solution-not-the-problem) [^3]: [Defence, security, and economic well-being among EU citizens’ top priorities: Eurobarometer - EU Perspectives](https://euperspectives.eu/2025/09/defence-security-eu-priorities) ### 8. The majority of people in the European Union do not want to get rid of fossil fuels. — 5% Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 13/07/2026 · Detail: /claim/ftNDIh2qmLbjOadqlaFX - Multiple Eurobarometer and independent surveys show that large majorities of EU citizens support reducing fossil-fuel dependence and back the clean-energy transition, directly contradicting the claim. - In the 2021 Special Eurobarometer on Climate Change, 81% of EU citizens agreed that clean energies should receive more public financial support even if this leads to a reduction in subsidies for fossil fuels, and 70% said reducing fossil-fuel imports benefits the EU economically[^1]. - The 2024 Special Eurobarometer on energy found that 81% of respondents agree reducing oil and gas imports while investing in renewables is important for overall security, and 82% say the EU should reduce its dependency on Russian fossil fuels as soon as possible[^2]. - The European Social Survey (Round 8, 2016) reported that citizens across Europe are generally “not keen on electricity being produced from fossil sources such as coal and natural gas” and favour renewables[^3]. - A May 2026 YouGov poll across five major EU countries found that over two-thirds of respondents believe reducing dependence on fossil fuels would make Europe safer, and majorities in Italy, France, Germany, Spain and Poland backed government financial support for heat pumps[^4][^5]. - No credible polling was found showing that a majority of EU citizens oppose phasing out or “getting rid of” fossil fuels. **Overall validity**: 5% [^1]: [Eurobarometer Survey: Europeans consider climate change to be the most serious problem facing the world - PubAffairs Bruxelles](https://www.pubaffairsbruxelles.eu/eu-institution-news/eurobarometer-survey-europeans-consider-climate-change-to-be-the-most-serious-problem-facing-the-world) [^2]: [Eurobarometers on energy - European Commission](https://energy.ec.europa.eu/data-and-analysis/eurobarometers-energy_en) [^3]: [Public Perceptions on Climate Change and Energy in ...](https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/ESS8_pawcer_climate_change.pdf) [^4]: [Majority of Europeans back reducing fossil fuel imports to make… | T\&E](https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/majority-of-europeans-back-reducing-fossil-fuel-imports-to-make-europe-safer-polling-shows) [^5]: [Majority of Europeans Back Reducing Fossil Fuel Imports to Make Europe Safer, Polling Shows - CleanTechnica](https://cleantechnica.com/2026/06/08/majority-of-europeans-back-reducing-fossil-fuel-imports-to-make-europe-safer-polling-shows)