Can someone honestly explain to me how a book titled "The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack, the Aftermath, and America's Response" was published on https://t.co/2aqc3ayv2f on SEPTEMBER 9TH, when the event took place on SEPTEMBER 10TH?? https://t.co/XqtypYKWcB H/T: @RamboAndFrens
Based on my research, I can verify this claim about the book's publication date and the Utah Valley University attack date:
Analysis:
The Attack Date: Charlie Kirk was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah123.
The Book's Listed Publication Date: An Amazon Kindle e-book titled "The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack, the Aftermath, and America's Response" appeared on Amazon with a displayed publication date of September 9, 2025 — one day before the shooting occurred456.
What Actually Happened:
Conspiracy Claims: The erroneous date fueled conspiracy theories that the shooting was staged or planned. However, multiple fact-checkers (Snopes, PolitiFact, AFP) have debunked this as a system glitch combined with AI-generated "clickbait" books exploiting breaking news events81045.
Amazon's Statement: "Due to a technical issue, the date of publication that had been displayed for this title, while it was briefly listed, was incorrect, and we apologize for any confusion this may have caused. The title was published late in the afternoon on September 10th"58.
Conclusion: While the book did appear to have a publication date of September 9 on Amazon, this was a technical error — the book was actually published after the attack on September 10. The author appears to be fabricated, and the book was AI-generated to capitalize on the tragedy.
Overall validity: 50%
Based on my research, here is my analysis of the claim:
Reasoning:
Overall validity: 95%
Verdict: TECHNICALLY TRUE but with important caveats
Reasoning:
While the book was technically "published" on Amazon (meaning it was listed and made available for purchase), this was not a legitimate, professionally published work. It was a quickly assembled, likely AI-generated e-book that was subsequently removed from the platform.
Overall validity: 40%
I need more information to fact-check this claim. The claim mentions "the book" but doesn't specify which book you're referring to.
Based on my search, I can confirm that the Utah Valley University Attack (the shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University) took place on September 10, 202512.
However, without knowing:
I cannot verify whether the book was published before or after this attack.
Could you please specify which book you're asking about? Once you provide the book's title (or author and publication date), I can verify the claim.
I don't have enough information to verify this claim. You mentioned that "the book was published on September 9th," but you didn't specify which book you're referring to.
Could you please tell me:
Once you provide these details, I can search for information about its actual publication date and verify the claim for you.
Based on my research, here's my analysis of this claim:
Analysis:
The URL https://t.co/2aqc3ayv2f is Twitter's URL shortener - The t.co domain is Twitter/X's official link service that automatically wraps and shortens all links shared on their platform, not a book publishing website12.
t.co is a redirect service, not a publishing platform - Links with the t.co format act as intermediaries that redirect users to the actual destination URL. They are used for tracking clicks and security screening, not for hosting or publishing content directly123.
No specific book information available - Without knowing what book is being referenced or where this specific t.co link redirects, the claim cannot be verified. The shortened URL could point to any website (Amazon, a publisher's site, a blog, etc.), but the claim incorrectly states the book was "published on" the t.co domain itself.
The claim fundamentally misunderstands URL structure - Books are not published on t.co; this domain only serves as a redirect wrapper. The actual publishing would occur on whatever destination URL the t.co link points to (e.g., Amazon, Google Books, a publisher's website).
Conclusion:
This claim contains a fundamental misunderstanding of how Twitter's URL shortening service works. The t.co domain is merely a redirect layer, not a publishing platform. The claim as stated is misleading or incorrect because it conflates a link-shortening service with a book publishing website.
Overall validity: 0%
Based on my research, here is my assessment:
Reasoning:
Overall validity: 100%