"Bill Gates has donated $50 million to a new company called Terrana Biosciences, and they're going to create a new category of biologically-modified crops." "It will not be labelled as modified, and it will not be labelled as GMO, but Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us." "Our EPA has already given it the green light.
Analysis:
The claim "Once ribonucleic acid is inside a plant, it replicates" is false as a universal statement. Most types of RNA—including messenger RNA, double-stranded RNA, and transfer RNA—do not self-replicate inside plant cells12. These molecules are typically degraded by cellular machinery rather than copied.
RNA replication requires a specific enzyme called RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which is encoded by most RNA viruses but is not a standard component of normal plant RNA metabolism345. For RNA to replicate, it must either carry the genetic instructions to produce this enzyme (as viral RNA does) or be part of a specially engineered self-replicating RNA system12.
Plants do possess their own RdRP enzymes, but these primarily function in antiviral defense—using viral RNA as a template to generate small complementary RNAs that trigger degradation of the viral RNA—rather than replicating incoming RNA for its own propagation56.
The claim appears to oversimplify or misrepresent descriptions of Terrana Biosciences' proprietary technology, which uses RNA from benign plant viruses as a "chassis." Because this chassis RNA is derived from viruses that naturally encode replication machinery, it can replicate once inside the plant78. However, this is a highly specific engineered system, not a general biological rule.
The statement conflates a narrow, technology-specific phenomenon with a broad biological principle. Exogenous RNA applied to plants (such as conventional dsRNA sprays or mRNA) generally does not replicate, which is why RNA stability and degradation have historically been major challenges in agricultural biotechnology79.
Overall validity: 15%
Overall validity: 72%
Here is my analysis of the claim:
Reasoning:
Overall validity: 95%
Here is my fact-check of this claim:
The claim uses inflammatory and misleading language ("putting insecticides within food") that conflates RNA-based crop protection with traditional chemical insecticides and suggests secret contamination of the food supply. This is false.
Overall validity: 5%
Based on my research, here's my analysis of this claim:
Analysis:
Overall validity: 75%
Analysis:
Overall validity: 5%
The claim is accurate. Terrana Biosciences does use RNA from viruses as a foundational component of its delivery technology.
Overall validity: 95%
Overall validity: 0%
Claim: Consumers will not know they are buying modified soybeans from Terrana Biosciences' technology
Terrana's technology is RNA-based crop protection, not traditional genetic modification. Terrana Biosciences develops RNA sprays and seed treatments that "program" plants with biological instructions to fight pathogens or stimulate immune responses12. The company explicitly distinguishes its RNA platform from "conventional transgenic (genetically modified)" approaches2.
RNA sprays do not necessarily modify plant DNA permanently. The technology delivers RNA molecules into plant cells that may be translated into proteins (like Cry proteins) or trigger immune responses, but this differs from bioengineering that modifies the plant's genetic material through rDNA techniques21.
USDA's Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires detectable modified genetic material. The standard defines bioengineered food as containing "genetic material that has been modified through in vitro rDNA techniques"3. RNA sprays are designed to degrade rapidly and may not leave detectable modified genetic material in the final food product45.
RNA-treated crops may avoid bioengineered labeling. Because RNA interference (RNAi) sprays don't involve modifying the plant's DNA through rDNA techniques, and the RNA is designed to degrade, treated crops may not meet the threshold for mandatory "bioengineered" disclosure under current USDA regulations46. RNAi crop sprays have even been described as appealing to markets where genetically modified crops are restricted6.
Products remain in development. As of mid-2025, Terrana's soybean products were still in the pipeline and not yet commercially available27. Regulatory requirements for these specific products remain to be finalized.
RNA pesticides are regulated under FIFRA, not as bioengineered foods. Similar RNAi crop protection products (like GreenLight Biosciences' Calantha) are regulated by EPA as pesticides under FIFRA, which does not require consumer food labeling to disclose pesticide treatments beyond residue tolerances89.
The claim has merit. Under current U.S. regulations, Terrana's RNA spray technology—applied to soybeans as a topical treatment or seed treatment—likely would not trigger mandatory bioengineered food disclosure requirements because it doesn't involve rDNA modification of the plant's genetic material and the RNA is designed to degrade without leaving detectable modified genetic material in food. This means consumers may not have clear labeling indicating the soybeans were treated with this technology. However, since Terrana's soybean products are not yet commercially available, some regulatory uncertainty remains.
Overall validity: 60%
Analysis of the claim:
Overall validity: 5%
Overall validity: 90%
Overall validity: 95%
Analysis of the claim:
Overall validity: 5%
The claim that Bill Gates donated $50 million to Terrana Biosciences is false. Here is my reasoning:
Overall validity: 0%
Based on my research, here is my analysis of this claim:
Analysis:
Overall validity: 65%
Overall validity: 55%
Based on my research, here is my analysis of the claim:
Analysis:
Terrana Biosciences is developing RNA-based agricultural solutions that are applied as topical sprays or seed treatments, not traditional transgenic genetic engineering12. The company explicitly states its technology works "without altering the plant genome"12.
USDA's National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires labeling of foods containing "detectable modified genetic material"34. If Terrana's RNA products do not result in permanent genetic changes that leave detectable modified DNA in the final food product, they may fall outside the current definition of "bioengineered" under USDA regulations3.
RNA interference (RNAi) and RNA-based crop technologies are relatively new, and there is ongoing debate about their regulatory classification. Advocacy groups have called for the USDA definition of "bioengineering" to explicitly include newer forms like RNAi56, though current regulations may not clearly cover temporary RNA applications.
As of the research date, Terrana's products remain in the research and development phase and have not yet received regulatory approval for commercial use7. The specific labeling determination for each product would depend on future EPA, FDA, and USDA evaluations.
The claim presents a definitive statement about future labeling requirements, but regulatory frameworks for novel RNA agricultural technologies are still evolving. Some sources note that certain RNAi applications may not trigger mandatory GMO/bioengineered labeling if they don't involve permanent genetic modification6, but this is not guaranteed for all product types.
Overall validity: 65%
The claim is plausible based on Terrana's description of its non-genome-altering RNA technology and current USDA labeling standards focused on detectable modified genetic material. However, it is stated with more certainty than is warranted, as regulatory classification of RNA-based crop treatments remains an evolving area, and Terrana's products have not yet completed the full regulatory approval process.
Overall validity: 5%
Here's my analysis of the claim:
The claim is FALSE.
Reasoning:
Overall validity: 0%