---
title: "A small village of just 800 people in North Yorkshire is set to receive 3,750 il…"
source: "https://x.com/ukfreedomunite/status/2070409521625784561"
platform: "X / Twitter"
factual_accuracy: 30
overall_accuracy: 10
tags: ["migration policy", "immigration", "local residents", "border policy", "uk politics", "rural community"]
---
# Source fact-check: A small village of just 800 people in North Yorkshire is set to receive 3,750 il…
Original post: https://x.com/ukfreedomunite/status/2070409521625784561
Factual accuracy: 30% · Overall accuracy: 10%
## Source post
**Target post by @ukfreedomunite**
> A small village of just 800 people in North Yorkshire is set to receive 3,750 illegal migrants, outnumbering the population
## Post analysis
Verdict: 10% · Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 26/06/2026
The post is highly misleading and largely inaccurate. While it appears to reference a real proposal to house asylum seekers at a former military site in North Yorkshire, it fundamentally misrepresents the scale, the legal status of the individuals, and the certainty of the plans.
The post does not name the specific village, which makes the precise population figure difficult to verify[^1]. However, the proposal in question concerns Linton-on-Ouse, where the population is cited by various sources at roughly 700 to 1,200 residents, meaning the figure of 800 is imprecise but in the general range[^2][^3].
Crucially, the claim that the village is “set to receive” 3,750 people is false. The 3,750 figure refers to the combined capacity across three separate military sites—MoD Bicester in Oxfordshire, MoD Barnham in Suffolk, and MoD Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire—not Linton-on-Ouse alone[^3][^2]. Linton-on-Ouse itself is expected to house approximately 1,200 asylum seekers, not 3,750[^3], so the proposed number of asylum seekers would not outnumber the local population in the manner described.
Furthermore, the post mischaracterizes the individuals as “illegal migrants,” but they are asylum seekers who have a legal status under UK law while their claims are processed[^3]. The phrase “set to receive” also overstates the certainty of the proposal, as planning permission has not yet been granted for these sites[^3].
**Overall validity: 10%**
[^1]:
[The village in North Yorkshire has a population of about 800 people.](#y0tc8Jjj0syWuMFhodoM)
[^2]:
[The village of 800 residents in North Yorkshire is slated to receive 3,750 migrants, which would exceed its existing population.](#Y7dat9CzZQZy2wIcSs1j)
[^3]:
[A village of 800 residents in North Yorkshire is scheduled to receive 3,750 illegal migrants, which would outnumber its population.](#O6YYqRAMI8VXfIPwzwsu)
## Claims found (3)
### 1. A village of 800 residents in North Yorkshire is scheduled to receive 3,750 illegal migrants, which would outnumber its population. — 15%
Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 26/06/2026 · Detail: /claim/O6YYqRAMI8VXfIPwzwsu
Based on my research, here's my analysis:
**Reasoning:**
- The claim of **800 residents** is inaccurate for Linton-on-Ouse — the 2011 census recorded **1,201 people** there, while local officials have recently cited figures closer to **700 people**[^1][^2].
- The **3,750 figure refers to the combined capacity across THREE military sites**, not just Linton-on-Ouse. The three sites are MoD Bicester (Oxfordshire), MoD Barnham (Suffolk), and MoD Linton-on-Ouse (North Yorkshire)[^3][^4][^5].
- **Linton-on-Ouse itself is expected to house approximately 1,200 single male asylum seekers**, not 3,750[^2][^6]. The claim conflates the total capacity of three separate sites with just one village[^4][^7].
- The people to be housed are **asylum seekers**, not "illegal migrants." Asylum seekers have a legal status under UK law while their claims are being processed, making the term "illegal" a mischaracterization[^7][^3].
- **Planning permission has not yet been granted** for any of these sites, so describing them as "scheduled to receive" overstates the certainty of the plans[^3][^7][^4].
- The 3,750 asylum seekers being divided across three sites would not individually outnumber any of the local populations — the claim is mathematically false because it treats a three-site total as if it were one village's allocation.
**Overall validity: 15%**
[^1]:
[Linton-on-Ouse - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linton-on-Ouse)
[^2]:
[RAF Linton-on-Ouse 'wrong place' for asylum seekers - councillors](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c05y12z3g79o)
[^3]:
[Home Office plan to use more military bases to house asylum seekers](http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgjm61lkl4o)
[^4]:
[Home Office eyes up three more military sites to house thousands of ...](https://ca.news.yahoo.com/home-office-eyes-three-more-213038351.html)
[^5]:
[Home Office plan to use more military bases to house asylum seekers - BBC News](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgjm61lkl4o)
[^6]:
[Dismay over new plans to house migrants at the RAF Linton site near York | YorkMix | YorkMix](https://www.yorkmix.com/mp-says-there-are-plans-to-use-raf-linton-on-ouse-as-an-asylum-centre-again)
[^7]:
[Charities condemn ‘arrogant’ plans to house asylum seekers at former military sites | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/25/charities-condemn-arrogant-plans-to-house-asylum-seekers-at-former-military-sites)
### 2. The village of 800 residents in North Yorkshire is slated to receive 3,750 migrants, which would exceed its existing population. — 35%
Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 26/06/2026 · Detail: /claim/Y7dat9CzZQZy2wIcSs1j
**Reasoning:**
- The claim correctly identifies a village in North Yorkshire (Linton-on-Ouse) that has been proposed as a site for housing asylum seekers at a former RAF base[^1][^2][^3].
- However, the 3,750 figure refers to the total number of asylum seekers planned across THREE military sites (MoD Bicester in Oxfordshire, MoD Barnham in Suffolk, and MoD Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire), not just Linton-on-Ouse alone[^1][^2][^4]. The claim falsely attributes the entire 3,750 to this single village.
- A previous plan in 2022 proposed housing up to 1,500 asylum seekers at Linton-on-Ouse specifically, but that plan was abandoned[^3][^5]. The new plan's specific allocation for Linton-on-Ouse is not stated, but it is clearly only a portion of the 3,750 total across three sites.
- The population figure of "800 residents" is also somewhat misleading. The 2011 census recorded Linton-on-Ouse's population as 1,201, while Apple Maps lists it as approximately 760[^6][^7]. So "800" is in the rough ballpark but not precisely accurate.
- Even if the entire 3,750 were allocated to Linton-on-Ouse, it would exceed the population, but that is not the actual proposal. The claim fundamentally misrepresents the scale by conflating the total across three sites with one village's allocation.
**Overall validity: 35%**
[^1]:
[Home Office eyes up three more military sites to house thousands of ...](https://ca.news.yahoo.com/home-office-eyes-three-more-213038351.html)
[^2]:
[Home Office plan to use more military bases to house asylum seekers](http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgjm61lkl4o)
[^3]:
[‘Gobsmacked’ villagers vow to fight revived asylum seeker centre plan - AOL](https://www.aol.com/articles/gobsmacked-villagers-vow-fight-revived-103712000.html)
[^4]:
[Home Office eyes up three more military sites to house thousands of asylum seekers | The Independent](https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/home-news/migrant-hotels-home-office-military-sites-housing-asylum-seekers-b3002764.html)
[^5]:
[Tories abandon plans to house 1,500 asylum seekers in Yorkshire village | Conservatives | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/aug/09/sunak-truss-rule-out-plans-house-asylum-seekers-yorkshire-linton-on-ouse)
[^6]:
[Linton-on-Ouse - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linton-on-Ouse)
[^7]:
[Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire, England - Apple Maps](https://maps.apple.com/place?auid=15294167255742628842)
### 3. The village in North Yorkshire has a population of about 800 people. — 40%
Model: Kimi K2.6 · Checked on: 26/06/2026 · Detail: /claim/y0tc8Jjj0syWuMFhodoM
This claim is **unverifiable as stated** because it does not identify which specific village in North Yorkshire is being referenced.
- North Yorkshire contains over 700 parishes and more than 800 communities ranging from small hamlets to large market towns[^1].
- The claim uses the definite article "The" but fails to name the village, making it impossible to verify which specific settlement is being described.
- There are villages in North Yorkshire with populations of approximately 800, such as **Middleham** (825 in the 2011 census, estimated at 816 in 2024)[^2][^3], **Huby** in Harrogate District (population 800 in 2021)[^4], and **Whitley** (population 793 in 2021)[^4].
- However, many other villages in North Yorkshire have populations significantly larger or smaller than 800.
Without knowing which specific village the claim refers to, its accuracy cannot be determined.
**Overall validity**: 40%
[^1]:
[North Yorkshire County Communities Village Town City council website North Riding North Yorks information](https://www.northyorkshire.org)
[^2]:
[Middleham - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middleham)
[^3]:
[Middleham (North Yorkshire, Yorkshire and the Humber, United Kingdom) - Population Statistics, Charts, Map, Location, Weather and Web Information](https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/yorkshireandthehumber/north_yorkshire/E63000420__middleham)
[^4]:
[Yorkshire and the Humber (United Kingdom): Settlements in Counties and Unitary Districts - Population Statistics, Charts and Map](https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/yorkshireandthehumber)